Sl.
No.
|
Agenda
Points
|
Details
of discussions & decisions/directions
|
Remarks/responsibility
|
1.
|
Review
of the last MOM (SMR)
|
Not applicable
|
This is the first management review meeting of the SA
8000:2001 system implemented at Le Shark and hence this point is not
applicable.
|
2.
|
Review
of SA 8000 policy
|
This is the first review, the policy is
found to be acceptable, as it is and no changes were considered
necessary.
|
SMR indicated that the communication of the policy to
employees was being facilitated by display in various locations,
display on notice boards etc. To communicate the policy to
outsiders, the policy was displayed at the security office at the
entrance of the factory. Also the policy was sent to all interested
parties and those associated with le shark through email.
|
3.
|
Review of the procedures and systems and
appropriate changes as a result of changes in work practices or
changes in relevant statutes
|
Policy, Procedures and systems were reviewed
through internal audit and performance results. The adequacy,
suitability and continuing effectiveness of the same are found to be
meeting the standard as well as company’s requirements. AO
indicated that there was a change in the minimum wages as per law
and this had been implemented.
|
|
4.
|
Review of the effectiveness of the systems
and procedures
|
SMR informed that the Policy, system and
procedures are implemented and their continuing effectiveness of the
same is found to be meeting the standard and company’s
requirements.
Child labour: The AO indicated
that no instance of child labour was reported in organization during
the period prior to the management review. The SMR also indicated
that during the Internal audit also no instances of child labour
were found. He indicated that in some cases, the personal files did
not have appropriate age proof records as many of the employees are
coming districts far away from tirupur.
Forced labour: AO indicated
that no form of forced labour was being practiced in Le Shark. SMR
informed that no forced labour was found during the internal audits.
Health & safety: The
Health & Safety Representative indicated that there were no
major issues pertaining to health & safety. AO also indicated
that notices pertaining to health and safety had been put up all
over the facility especially explaining the purpose and need of
using Personal Protective Equipment. AO also indicated that a rest
room for employees was being built along with a crèche for
children. Both would be ready by the 15th of July. The AO
indicated that the last Fire Drill Evacuation was conducted on
23-04-2005. The evacuation was carried out with out any untoward
incident.
Freedom of Association &
Collective bargaining: See section on committee meetings.
Disciplinary action: AO
discussed that no major disciplinary action was taken and all action
initiated was recorded and available.
Discrimination: AO indicated
that no case of discrimination was found in the facility. SMR also
indicated that there was no case of discrimination identified during
internal audits.
Remuneration: AO and SMR
indicated that there were no issues with remuneration. OT was being
paid at a premium. AO indicated that there were some cases were
employees were not being covered under ESI & PF due to floating
of labour.
Working hours: AO indicated
that working hours were within limits. The OT hours were regulated
and only an OT of one hour was being worked.
Management Systems:
AO indicated
that the SA 8000 policy was displayed in all sections and the
workers were distributed handbooks containing the policy.
It was decided to convey that from the next MRM onwards, the
same should be circulated to the interested parties and suppliers
through mail or writeups. The SMR declared that all the company
representatives are effectively completing their responsibilities by
good planning. SMR indicated that the control of suppliers on the basis of
SA 8000 requirements need to be reviewed every six months.
SMR wanted all non-conformance clauses to be cleared at the
earliest without any delay in the future.
As far as outside communication was concerned, SMR felt that
creating a web site would be the best way and asked AO to complete
the same within the next six months. Also he instructed that any time to give access to all
records and required information to all interested parties.
|
HRD Asst Sadhana was made responsible to collect all the
age proof records which were found missing in the file.
The target date for the same was given as 15-05-2005.
MD indicated that the nurse should prepare a summary of the
injuries and treatment given on a monthly basis. The tracking should
also identify how many injuries were related to the workplace and
how many were related to external issues such as fever and cold.
It was decided that in future the place where the trigger
was activated was also to be recorded. AO indicated that he would
ensure that in future drills this would be recorded.
It was decided that the workers who work for a period of a
minimum three months should be covered under ESI and PF so as to
create stability of workforce. Vipul the operations manager has been
made responsible to see to that the coverage is maintained.
|
5.
|
Review of training and awareness programs.
|
AO indicated that the SA 8000 Awareness and
SA 8000 internal auditor-training program has been conducted. Apart
from this AO indicated that as part of induction process, SA 8000
related training was also provided to workers.
|
|
6.
|
Review of conformance of suppliers.
|
AO indicated that SA 8000 questionnaire had
been sent to suppliers and reports of visits to suppliers was also
available.
|
It was found that all major suppliers have sent back the
questionnaire and all other sub suppliers and sub contractors are
also filling up the questionnaire and returning them back.
Others who have not returned back the questionnaire have been
contacted over phone as well as personally to return back the filled
in questionnaire.
|
7.
|
Review of external communication received
|
AO indicated that no external communication
pertaining to the SA 8000 system was received. To facilitate such
communication, a communication register was placed at the security
office of the factory for visitors and for others a web site for
planned in the near future.
|
AO was made responsible to create such a site within the
next six months.
|
8.
|
Review of non-conformance raised during
internal audits
|
SMR indicated that the 4 NC’s raised
during the internal audit on 11/02/05 had been closed and corrective
action as applicable had been taken. The next internal audit was
planned in the month of August 05
|
|
9.
|
Review of committee meetings
|
Anti Sexual harassment committee
meeting minutes: The AO indicated that the last meeting was
held on 11-04-2005. The meeting was attended by the MD, other staff
and by representatives from among the women employees. He said that
there were no cases of sexual harassment reported in the company.
The members indicated that a separate ‘Q’ system for the ladies
in the canteen would be required. The MD agreed to this request and
instructed the AO to ensure that necessary arrangements were made.
The meeting concluded with a decision to reconvene again on the 26th
of May 2005.
Canteen committee meeting minutes: The
last meeting of the Canteen committee was held on 07/05/05 in the
canteen and attended by the members as indicated in the records. The
AO indicated that actions had been initiated on the points raised in
the meetings.
Workers committee meeting: The
last workers committee meeting was held on the 15th of
April 2005. The points raised in the meeting was also reviewed and
pending points noted in the Management Review Register.
|
AO was asked to implement the Q system immediately in the
canteen.
The MD instructed that the proposed date of
completion of the actions must also be recorded so that this can be
tracked.
MD indicated that on quarterly basis, the pending points
should be summarized and presented for review and tracking purpose.
|